Make vs Power Automate (2026): Which Automation Platform Is Better?
Make is the better visual automation builder with more flexible pricing. Power Automate wins if your business runs on Microsoft 365 and needs deep SharePoint, Teams, and Dynamics integration.
You want the best visual workflow builder, work with diverse tools beyond Microsoft, or need advanced data transformation and HTTP capabilities.
Your business runs on Microsoft 365 (Teams, SharePoint, Outlook, Dynamics) and you want automation deeply embedded in your existing Microsoft ecosystem.
Key Takeaways
- Make visual builder is widely considered the most intuitive automation interface available.
- Power Automate integrates natively with all Microsoft 365 apps at no extra cost for basic flows.
- Make starts at $9/month for 10,000 operations. Power Automate starts at $15/user/month.
- Make has 1,800+ integrations. Power Automate has 1,000+ connectors plus all Microsoft services.
- For non-Microsoft workflows, Make is significantly more flexible and easier to use.
| Feature | Make | Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per operations | Per user/per flow |
| Starting price | $9/mo (10,000 ops) | $15/user/mo |
| Free tier | 1,000 ops/month | Included with Microsoft 365 (limited) |
| Visual builder | Excellent (best in class) | Good (improving) |
| Microsoft integration | Via connectors | Native (deep) |
| Non-Microsoft integrations | 1,800+ | 1,000+ connectors |
| Data transformation | Advanced (built-in) | Moderate |
| AI capabilities | AI nodes available | Copilot integration, AI Builder |
| Best for | Diverse tool stacks, visual builders | Microsoft-heavy organizations |
Where Make Wins
Visual workflow builder
Make scenario builder is the most intuitive visual automation interface available. Complex multi-branch workflows are easy to understand at a glance. Power Automate flow designer is functional but less visually clear, especially for complex automations.
Pricing flexibility
Make charges by operations, not users. A team of 50 people using the same automation costs no more than one person. Power Automate at $15/user/month becomes expensive for large teams.
Non-Microsoft integrations
Make connects to 1,800+ services with deep, well-maintained integrations. For businesses using diverse tool stacks (Google, Slack, HubSpot, Stripe, Shopify), Make has better coverage and more reliable connectors.
Where Power Automate Wins
Microsoft 365 integration
Power Automate is embedded in Microsoft 365. It triggers from Outlook emails, Teams messages, SharePoint uploads, and Excel changes natively. No API keys, no connector setup. For Microsoft-first organizations, this zero-configuration integration is a major advantage.
AI Builder and Copilot
Power Automate AI Builder lets you create custom AI models (form processing, object detection, text classification) without code. Microsoft Copilot integration generates flows from natural language descriptions. Make has AI nodes but nothing comparable to AI Builder.
Pricing Comparison
| Tier | Make | Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 1,000 ops/month, 2 scenarios | Limited (with Microsoft 365) |
| Starter | $9/mo (10,000 ops) | $15/user/mo |
| Pro | $16/mo (40,000 ops) | $15/user/mo + premium connectors |
| Teams | $29/mo (80,000 ops) | $40/user/mo (Process plan) |
AdAI Recommendation
Choose Make if...
Your business uses a diverse set of tools beyond Microsoft. You want the most visual, intuitive automation builder. You prefer paying per usage rather than per user.
Choose Power Automate if...
Your business is built on Microsoft 365 and you want automation embedded in Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, and Dynamics. You need AI Builder for custom AI models without code.
The bottom line
Make for diverse, visual automation needs. Power Automate for Microsoft-heavy organizations. If you use both Microsoft and non-Microsoft tools, Make is the more flexible choice.