Zapier vs Make (2026): Which Automation Platform Is Better for SMBs?
For absolute beginners who want the simplest setup possible, choose Zapier. For businesses that need complex workflows, better pricing, or more control over data transformations, choose Make. Make offers significantly more value per dollar for most SMB use cases.
You are brand new to automation, use niche software that might not be on Make, or want the simplest possible setup with native AI actions built in.
Budget matters, you need complex workflows with branching or loops, or you plan to scale to dozens of automations. Make is 50-70% cheaper at equivalent usage.
Key Takeaways
- Zapier is the easiest automation tool on the market. If simplicity is your top priority, it wins.
- Make is 50-70% cheaper than Zapier at equivalent usage levels and handles complex workflows better.
- Zapier has 7,000+ integrations versus Make at 1,500+. For rare or niche apps, Zapier has better coverage.
- Make supports branching, looping, and parallel paths. Zapier is mostly linear (step by step).
- Both offer free tiers. Start with whichever feels more intuitive and switch later if needed.
| Feature | Zapier | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free / $19.99/mo (Professional) | Free / $9/mo (Core) |
| Ease of use | 10/10 (simplest on market) | 8/10 (visual but more complex) |
| Integrations | 7,000+ apps | 1,500+ apps |
| Workflow complexity | Linear (step-by-step) | Branching, looping, parallel paths |
| AI capabilities | AI actions (ChatGPT, Claude built-in) | HTTP modules for any AI API |
| Free tier | 100 tasks/month, 5 Zaps | 1,000 ops/month, 2 scenarios |
| Error handling | Basic (retry, alert) | Advanced (error routes, fallbacks) |
| Data transformation | Limited (Formatter steps) | Extensive (built-in functions) |
| Pricing model | Per task (each step counts) | Per operation (more generous) |
| Best for | Beginners, simple automations | Complex workflows, power users |
Where Zapier Wins
Ease of use
Zapier is the gold standard for simplicity. Its wizard-style setup walks you through each step: choose a trigger app, choose a trigger event, connect your account, choose an action app, map the fields, and turn it on. A first-time user can build a working automation in under 5 minutes. Make is visual and powerful, but the canvas interface has a steeper learning curve.
Integration breadth
Zapier connects to over 7,000 apps, nearly five times Make's library. If you use niche industry software (specific dental practice management tools, boutique CRMs, or regional accounting platforms), Zapier is far more likely to have a native integration. Make covers all the major platforms but may require workarounds for less common tools.
AI actions
Zapier recently added native AI actions that let you use ChatGPT, Claude, and other models directly within your automations without configuring API keys. You simply add an "AI by Zapier" step, write your prompt, and the AI processes your data. Make can do the same via HTTP modules, but it requires more manual configuration.
Where Make Wins
Pricing
Make is dramatically cheaper for most use cases. Its free tier offers 1,000 operations per month (versus 100 tasks on Zapier). At paid tiers, Make at $9/month provides 10,000 operations. Zapier at $19.99/month provides 750 tasks. The pricing model also differs: Zapier charges per step in a workflow, while Make is more generous in how it counts operations. For a growing business running dozens of automations, Make can cost 50-70% less than Zapier.
Workflow complexity
Make's visual canvas supports branching (if/then logic with multiple paths), parallel execution (doing two things simultaneously), iterators (looping through lists), and error-specific handling routes. Zapier workflows are mostly linear: trigger, then step 1, then step 2, then step 3. For complex business logic, Make is significantly more capable.
Data transformation
Make includes extensive built-in functions for text manipulation, date formatting, math operations, and data structure changes. You can transform data between steps without external tools. Zapier handles basic formatting but requires additional "Formatter" steps that count toward your task limit for anything complex.
Pricing Breakdown
| Tier | Zapier | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 100 tasks/mo, 5 Zaps | 1,000 ops/mo, 2 scenarios |
| Starter/Core | $19.99/mo (750 tasks) | $9/mo (10,000 ops) |
| Professional/Pro | $49/mo (2,000 tasks) | $16/mo (10,000 ops, more features) |
| Team | $69/mo (unlimited users) | $29/mo (unlimited users) |
Prices as of February 2026. Both platforms offer annual billing discounts of approximately 20%.
AdAI's Recommendation
Choose Zapier if...
You are brand new to automation and want the simplest possible experience. You use niche software that might not be on Make. You want native AI actions without configuring API keys. You are building simple, linear automations (5 steps or fewer).
Choose Make if...
Budget matters and you want more automation for less money. You need complex workflows with branching, loops, or parallel paths. You are comfortable with a slightly steeper learning curve in exchange for more power. You plan to scale to dozens or hundreds of automations.
Our overall pick for SMBs: Make
For most small businesses building 5-20 automations, Make offers the best balance of capability and cost. The learning curve is modest (1-2 hours), and the cost savings compound as your automation library grows. Start with Make, and only switch to Zapier if you need a specific integration that Make does not support.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Zapier or Make cheaper?
Can I switch from Zapier to Make?
Which is better for AI automation workflows?
Do I need a developer to use either platform?
Related Comparisons & Resources
n8n vs Make
Compare Make with the open-source alternative.
No-Code Automation
Understanding the no-code automation landscape.
Workflow Automation
The broader concept behind these tools.
What Business Processes Should I Automate First?
Where to start with your first automation.
Automation ROI Statistics 2026
Hard numbers on automation returns.